Then Amazon Pink Dolphin’s Voice: Chevron sued in Canada for Amazon environment destruction

Chevron sued in Canada by Ecuadorians over pollution

Dolores Ochoa / AP

Ecuadorans who have waged a bitter legal battle against Chevron over pollution in the Amazon rain forest sued the company in Canada on Wednesday in an attempt to seize $18 billion of the oil giant’s assets, after Chevron refused to pay a verdict against it in their homeland.

The Ecuadorans also threatened to pursue Chevron in other countries, if necessary.

“We plan to exercise our legal right to collect every penny of the legitimate judgment from Ecuador, even if we have to drag Chevron kicking and screaming into courts around the world,” said Pablo Fajardo, lead lawyer on the Ecuadorans’ legal team.

The move, announced just hours after Chevron’s annual shareholders meeting in San Ramon, marked the latest dramatic turn for a legal case already noted for its vicious tactics, marathon length and international reach.

After 18 years of litigation, a collection of Ecuadoran forest tribes and farming communities won an $18 billion judgment against Chevron in 2011, holding the company responsible for tainted soil and water that they blamed on Texaco, which used to operate in the area. Chevron bought Texaco in 2001.

Chevron refused to pay the judgment, calling it the result of judicial fraud. And since the company no longer operates in Ecuador, the court system there could not seize any of Chevron’s assets to satisfy the judgment.

Hence Wednesday’s lawsuit, filed in the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario. For the past year, the Ecuadorans have threatened to sue Chevron in places where the company has extensive operations. Canada fits the bill. Chevron is one of a number of companies developing northern Alberta’s vast oil sands, and it also has a major new offshore project near Newfoundland.

“The time for delay is over,” Fajardo said. “While Chevron might think it can ignore court orders in Ecuador, it will be impossible to ignore a court order in Canada, where a court may seize the company’s assets if necessary to secure payment.”

Chevron maintains that the lawsuit is nothing but an extortion attempt. The company has filed a racketeering case against the plaintiffs’ lawyers in New York and has forced them to turn over many of their internal memos, e-mails – even the diary of the former lead attorney on the case. Some of the evidence obtained shows lawyers discussing ways to pressure the Ecuadoran judges who presided over the suit.

The company said late Wednesday that it will continue to pursue the racketeering case.

“The Ecuador judgment is a product of bribery, fraud and it is illegitimate,” Chevron’s statement read. “The company does not believe that the Ecuador judgment is enforceable in any court that observes the rule of law.”

Texaco drilled for oil in northeastern Ecuador from 1964 to 1992, working as a partner of state-owned Petroecuador. As part of its operations, Texaco dumped a mixture of petroleum and water into open pits near the wells. When Texaco pulled out of the country, it agreed to clean up a portion of the wells, while Petroecuador continued to operate the rest.

The first version of the lawsuit against Texaco was filed in 1993 in New York. Chevron bought Texaco in 2001 and argued successfully to have the case moved to Ecuador in 2003, saying the courts there were fully capable of handling the case.

Source: San Francisco Chronicle

UPDATE: Chevron Hears Concerns About Gas Fracking, Ecuador At Meeting

–Shareholder activists, demonstrators raise concerns about fracking, Ecuador

–Ecuadorean plaintiffs sue Chevron in Canada

–Chevron shareholders vote on gas fracking, other shareholder proposals

(Adds details about a lawsuit filed against Chevron in Canada in the second paragraph, a comment from Chevron in the sixth paragraph and other details.)

By Cassandra Sweet

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

SAN RAMON, Calif. -(Dow Jones)- Chevron Corp. (CVX) tried to focus attention Wednesday on its plans to expand oil and gas production, but the company’s use of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and its ongoing environmental battle in Ecuador arose as key issues.

Activist shareholders from Ecuador and other countries spoke at the company’s annual meeting and asked Chevron to live up to its responsibilities in Ecuador, where Texaco, an oil company that Chevron bought several years ago, used to have oil operations.

Later in the day, lawyers representing residents of an Amazon rain forest disclosed that they filed a lawsuit in Canada against Chevron. The plaintiffs said they aim to seize assets there belonging to Chevron as part of their effort to collect an $18.2 billion judgment they won in Ecuador in a pollution case.

Earlier in the day, Chevron shareholders voted on eight shareholder resolutions, including one that would require the company to report on the risks it faces in drilling for natural gas using fracking, a horizontal drilling technique in which water, sand and chemicals are injected at high pressure into underground wells to extract natural gas. A second proposal would have called for the company to appoint an independent chairman of the board who is not a company executive. None of the shareholder proposals obtained a majority of favorable votes.

During the meeting, Chevron Chairman and Chief Executive John Watson accused the Ecuadorean plaintiffs’ attorneys of fraud and said that although the company lost in an Ecuadorean court, an international court in the Netherlands has ruled in Chevron’s favor.

Chevron later issued a statement in response to the new lawsuit in Canada, saying “the Ecuador judgment is a product of bribery, fraud, and it is illegitimate. The company does not believe that the Ecuador judgment is enforceable in any court that observes the rule of law.”

The plaintiffs have denied the fraud allegation and have in turn accused Chevron of the same.

Ecuadorean indigenous groups sued Chevron for environmental damage they say was caused by Texaco Inc. Chevron inherited the lawsuit when it bought Texaco in 2001. The oil company denies the allegations.

In 2011, an Ecuadorean court ordered Chevron to pay $9.5 billion in remediation costs and plaintiff damages, and an additional $8.6 billion if it refused to apologize for the alleged environmental damage.

Last week, a shareholder group led by New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli urged Chevron to settle the legal battle in Ecuador, saying it has hurt indigenous people in Ecuador and damaged Chevron’s reputation.

Several dozen protesters stood on a sidewalk outside Chevron’s corporate headquarters in San Ramon, holding signs that asked for justice in Ecuador and safety improvements in Nigeria, Angola, Brazil and other countries where Chevron has operations.

Others raised concerns about the impact on the environment and public health of hydraulic fracturing drilling techniques Chevron and other companies use to produce natural gas from shale rock. The techniques have unleashed an unprecedented oil and gas production boom in the U.S.

In response to the concerns, Watson said Chevron “supports expanded disclosure” of chemicals used in drilling for gas. He said the company discloses chemicals it uses on a website called fracfocus.org. Watson said the key challenges are ensuring all industry players use best practices to prevent environmental damage and inform the public about what to expect if they live near a gas field where fracking techniques are used.

“Fracking is not a new technology, but it has come to new areas,” Watson told reporters after the meeting. “I think there are legitimate concerns, and we’re willing to address them.”

But Larry Fahn, president of shareholder advocacy group As You Sow, which sponsored the proposal requesting a report from Chevron on the risks of gas production, said concerns about pollution, road congestion and other problems are growing among communities near gas fields. He added that some of Chevron’s rivals have voluntarily provided more information about their fracking activities.

“We still don’t know what chemicals are being injected into these wells and what the risks and liabilities might be of water contamination and water and air pollution,” Fahn said in a brief interview following the meeting. “Many previously bucolic, rural areas are becoming industrialized, and there’s new traffic, crime and rising prices. Because of that, communities are pushing back.”

Fahn cited Bulgaria is an example of an area where public concerns about safety prompted the government to issue a moratorium on gas drilling.

Chevron said it planned to spend about $28.5 billion this year in oil and gas production facilities around the world, and about $9 billion in the U.S., including projects in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, gas fields in Pennsylvania and at a refinery in Mississippi. The company plans to spend an additional $3.6 billion on downstream operations, such as refining and marketing.

While natural gas production is a key area of expansion for Chevron, the company doesn’t plan to get involved in exporting the commodity from North America, Watson said.

Source: NASDAQ

SELVA Vida Sin Fronteras acknowledges Kevin Schafer’s important contribution towards protecting the highly endangered Amazon pink fresh water dolphin. Title photographs of our “The Amazon Pink Dolphin’s Voice” were taken by Mr. Schafer. 

Editorial: SELVA-Vida Sin Fronteras

Selvavidasinfronteras.wordpress.com

 

Advertisements

~ by FSVSF Admin on 31 May, 2012.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: