The Amazon Pink Dolphin’s Voice: Water Wars-Indigenous Ecuadorians vs. Corporations

 

Water Wars: Indigenous Ecuadorians vs. Corporations

 

Members of the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador (CONAIE) march in Quito, Ecuador against the 2002 summit of the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA/ALCA).Donovan & Scott

Share on Facebook

On March 22, World Water Day, the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador (CONAIE) arrived in the city of Quito, concluding their 14-day national protest march. Hundreds of indigenous Ecuadorians from the Amazonian and Andean regions came wearing traditional regalia to protest the same government they once helped bring to office. CONAIE hopes their protest will mobilize indigenous communities against new mining developments and a proposed law that would sell international corporations the rights to local water resources.

Ecuadorian communities learned from the way that Chevron’s operations flouted environmental law in the 1990’s, that once entrusted to foreign businesses their natural resources are usually squandered. In instances where Ecuadorian courts have sought reparations for those losses, such as with the monumental lawsuit against Chevron, Ecuadorian lawmakers have folded under pressure from international bodies influenced by the offending syndicates.

The march into Quito is just one act in a growing grassroots movement among indigenous peoples seeking political recognition and protection. According to the United Nations, indigenous peoples own 11% of the world’s forests, including many biodiversity hotspots. So far they have been losing the fight.

Ecuador was the first nation in the world to add legally defendable Rights of Nature to its constitution. But Ecuadorian politicians have not lived up to that amendment. Foreign companies have proven they can’t be trusted to safeguard land and water belonging to Ecuador’s indigenous groups. Hopefully, the government will heed these peaceful protests and allow the indigenous to retain full control of their resources; if not these peoples may turn to less peaceful methods because they will have nothing left to lose.

According to indigenous leaders, the timing is connected to a mining contract signed earlier this month with the Chinese-owned company Ecuacorriente. Ecuador’s President, Rafael Correa, claims that CONAIE seeks to destabilize the government.

These controversial marches ended just weeks after the decision by Ecuador’s Judicial Council to dismiss both of the judges that proceeded over an environmental lawsuit against Chevron Corp. Indigenous plaintiffs from Ecuador’s northern jungle region had sued Chevron for polluting their water and land, desecrating the health of local populations. The judges rendered a verdict of over $18 billion in favor of the plaintiffs.

However, the UN court in The Hague forbid Ecuador from assessing the penalties against Chevron. The UN justified its decision by saying the Ecuadorian government did not guarantee an impartial trial, and thus violated the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT). While the judges were dismissed on charges unrelated to the lawsuit, their dismissal further discredited that monumental verdict.

The complete negation of the ruling against Chevron in Ecuador goes against recommendations by UN experts released on March 19, advising the incorporation of human rights “norms and standards” into the goals for the UN’s upcoming sustainable development forum in June.

There has recently been a growing global awareness that human rights and environmental protection are inseparably intertwined. At the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Principle 1 of the Final Declaration states: “Man has the fundamental right to freedom, equality and adequate conditions of life in an environment of a quality that permits a life of dignity and well-being, and he bears a solemn responsibility to protect and improve the environment for present and future generations.”

By these criteria, Chevron clearly violated the rights of Ecuador’s jungle-dwelling communities by contaminating vital community resources.

Furthermore, Article 8 of the Universal Declaration states that: “Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights.”

Courts in the United States rejected the Chevron case, claiming that Ecuador was the appropriate location for such a trial. The UN then negated Ecuador’s verdict without offering a solution for a retrial, thus further violating the rights of peoples already victimized.

The Ecuadorian activists that marched into Quito must hope their appeal to local indigenous allies will be enough to counteract the lack of support from both the national and international courts. The privatization of Ecuador’s water resources could spell disaster for its people and legendary biodiversity. And despite all its rhetoric, the international legal system has proved it values corporate interests over the life and dignity of Ecuador’s indigenous peoples.

Source: Policymic

Ecuador’s Correa won’t let protests deter mining deals

President Rafael Correa insisted Thursday he will push forward with plans to develop major mining deals with foreign companies, despite the arrival in Quito of indigenous protestors who fear their lands will be wrecked.

Author: By Eduardo Garcia and Alexandra Valencia.

QUITO (REUTERS) –

Ecuador’s President Rafael Correa insisted on Thursday he will push ahead with plans to develop large-scale mining, seeking to ride out the arrival in Quito of indigenous demonstrators who fear their lands will be wrecked.

Indigenous protesters have been marching for weeks to reach the capital, where thousands took over streets waving flags and shouting slogans. Some had their faces painted black and held wooden spears, while others wore the colorful ponchos typical of the Andean highlands.

Meanwhile, several thousand supporters of the leftist Correa gathered in other parts of the city. He says the anti-mining march was whipped up by the opposition to hurt his government before a Feb. 2013 presidential election.

The U.S.-trained economist said he needs more foreign investment to fuel welfare spending – a key contributor to his high popularity during five years in power.

“We know that mining is necessary for modern life. As well as the raw materials, we need the revenue so that we can care for handicapped people, pay for social security, build roads,” the president told local radio on Thursday.

Correa said the country’s first ever large-scale mining deal, which was signed with Chinese-owned Ecuacorriente earlier this month, guarantees the government – not the miners – will receive most of the income from mineral exports.

“These are the best negotiated contracts ever in world history,” he said. “We got as much out of them as was possible.”

Ecuador hopes to sign three contracts this year with Canadian gold miners Kinross, International Minerals and IAMGOLD, and a second deal with Ecuacorriente, which should help the OPEC nation diversify its economy away from oil exports.

Mining sources say they are confident Ecuador’s government will not revise its policies in the face of pressure from local communities – but that they are concerned by signs the opposition is getting more involved in the anti-mining movement.

“The possible problems that mining can cause have been exaggerated and demonized,” Santiago Yepez, head of Ecuador’s mining chamber, told Reuters.

“We have to give mining a chance to prove it can bring development without causing the types of environmental disasters some are talking about.”

Indigenous protesters played a key role in popular uprisings that forced two Ecuadorean presidents to step down in 1997 and 2000, and similar protests forced Bolivian leader Evo Morales to cancel plans to build a road through an Amazonian national park and indigenous territory.

Rural towns in Peru have also rallied against mining, at times paralyzing big projects, though that country’s indigenous organizations lack the unity and political clout to stage national protests like their peers in neighboring Bolivia and Ecuador.

Source: Mineweb

SELVA Vida Sin Fronteras acknowledges Kevin Schafer’s important contribution towards protecting the highly endangered Amazon pink fresh water dolphin. Title photographs of our “The Amazon Pink Dolphin’s Voice” were taken by Mr. Schafer. 

Editorial: Selvavidasinfronteras.org

Selvavidasinfronteras.wordpress.com

Advertisements

~ by FSVSF Admin on 28 March, 2012.

One Response to “The Amazon Pink Dolphin’s Voice: Water Wars-Indigenous Ecuadorians vs. Corporations”

  1. Remember to avoid eating to much fast food and junk food, which is
    not good for you. Best of all it’s perfectly safe & natural as you aren’t
    doing anything dangerous like starving your body as low calorie diets often require.
    If you live in a condominium or an apartment, why not take the stairs instead of using the
    elevator.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: