Environmental Impacts of Mining and Smelting

Background

The mining sector is responsible for some of the largest releases of heavy metals into the environment of any industry. It also releases other air pollutants including sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides in addition to leaving behind tons of waste tailings, slag, and acid drainage. Occupational and environmental exposure to heavy metals, silica, and asbestos can occur during mining and milling operations. The smelting process (extracting the metal from the ore) is associated with the highest exposures and environmental releases.

The hazards to human health caused by exposure to heavy metals – including lead, cadmium and mercury – have been thoroughly documented. These metals are associated with a range of neurological deficits in both children and adults in addition to a range of other systemic affects. Exposure to airborne silica and asbestos can cause lung cancer, pneumoconiosis and numerous other health effects.

Lead and Mercury Emissions from Mining

  • Global releases of lead from smelting and refining nonferrous metals (e.g. gold, lead,
    zinc, copper) total over 28,000 metric tons/year.1
  • Global releases of mercury from smelting and refining nonferrous metals total 710 metric tons/year – the second largest source after power plants. 2
  • Estimates of releases of mercury into the environment from artisanal/ small scale gold mining range from 400 to 1,102 metric tons/year.2 3
  • Airborne emissions from metal mining and smelting in Australia, Canada, and the U.S.
    – countries with some of the world’s best environmental controls – total 980 metric tons of lead and 9 metric tons of mercury annually (2008/2009). These lead emissions amount to more than 80% of lead production in these countries.4 5

While pollution controls can minimize exposures to workers and surrounding communities, these safeguards are often absent in mining and smelting operations in developing countries. Even relatively efficient mining operations result in enormous waste, emissions to air and water, and a legacy of environmental contamination in nearby communities. Around the world, unsafe mining and smelting practices have been responsible for a continuing series of environmental and human health disasters, which cause great human tragedy, and undermine social stability, economic development and sustainability goals.

For example, in 2010, more than 400 children died in Zamfara, Nigeria from acute lead poisoning caused by unsafe mining and processing lead-containing gold ore. People grinding the ore, often in and around their homes, contaminated at least 180 villages over a wide area.

Even large-scale gold mining has significant mercury releases associated with ore processing. It is now known that significant mercury emissions result from cyanide leaching and even from mine tailings where no mercury has been added.6

Manual mills are used to grind ore from which gold is then recovered by mercury amalgamation in Mozambique. This is a very inefficient process that recovers less than 30% of the gold. (Photo courtesy of Rodolfo Neiva de Sousa.)

More commonly, small-scale gold mining utilizes significant quantities of mercury to extract gold from the ore. Exposure to mercury in these operations not only endangers miners and their families, but is also detrimental to the environment when deposited into the water supply. Artisanal gold mining employs an estimated 10-15 million miners in more than 55 countries.7 Estimates are that these small operations produce about 20% of the world’s gold supply.

Many studies have documented significant mercury exposures in these gold mining communities. In the Madre de Dios region of Peru, gold shops serving small artisanal miners were found to have mercury levels that were more than 20 times the World Health Organization (WHO) occupational health standard for mercury.8 This region of Peru alone has over 20,000 informal gold mining operations.

Children Are Most Susceptible

Children suffer a disproportionate share of the disease burden imposed by mining pollution. The International Labour Organization (ILO) estimates that 250 million children are involved in child labor and that over 70 percent of them face hazardous conditions. Children in Asia, South America, and Africa participate in the mining of gold, tin, and precious metals. According to the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), small-scale gold processing operations in developing countries employ one million children. Children, who are more susceptible to the impacts of heavy metals, tend to have higher exposures and generally account for the majority of deaths and disease associated with mass poisoning incidents from these operations. Studies have documented that children involved in mining have higher exposures to mercury, lead, and other metals and suffer severe lead and mercury intoxication.9

Grinding and crushing operations to recover gold in Zamfara Nigeria were conducted at numerous sites in 180 villages. Some of this ore contained up to 10% lead. (Photo courtesy of TerraGraphics Environmental Engineering.)

Outsourcing Hazardous Processing – A Growing Problem

In recent years we have witnessed a growing shift to export the most polluting aspects of the mining industry to developing countries. The U.S. exports millions of tons of mined ore to countries with more lenient environmental and occupational regulations and little enforcement. For example, in 2010, 50% of the lead ore mined in the U.S. was exported to China and South Korea for processing (see below). Only 25% of the lead ore mined in the U.S. is now processed at the nation’s one remaining primary smelter.

Sources: U.S. International Trade Commission; U.S. Geological Survey

The graph below shows that lead ore exports from the U.S. to China grew by 50 percent between 2005 and 2010. China has reported more than 30 serious lead poisoning incidentsaround lead smelters and battery recyclers since 2009.

U.S. Lead Ore Exports to China
(2005 – 2010)

Source: U.S. International trade Commission

Moreover, changes in the global economy threaten to increasethe harm caused by unsafe mining and smelting practices. Growing demand for metals and increasing commodity prices are encouraging expansion of both formal and small-scale mining and recycling around the world.

In addition, initiatives aimed at reducing global carbon emissions can have the unintended consequence of increasing lead poisoning in developing countries. For example, the adoption of solar, wind power and electric vehicles is increasing demand for lead batteries. The development of new applications for larger lithium ion batteries is significantly increasing the demand for lithium, cobalt, manganese and other metals. This trend may continue if plans to accelerate the production of electric and hybrid vehicles are realized.

Global Campaign to End Hazardous Mining Activities

The response to the reported mass poisoning incidents surrounding mining and smelting operations is predictably similar from country to country: shock upon discovery of the problem, medical treatment of survivors (to the extent that resources are available), and a call for huge sums to remediate environmental contamination. In most cases no one is left to cover the costs of environmental cleanup or even to compensate workers harmed on the job. A new approach is needed to prevent these human health impacts and environmental contamination before the damage is done.

OK International is therefore calling for a global campaign to end dangerous mining, smelting and recycling practices that poison children, workers, and families in developing countries and leave adjacent communities devastated by widespread contamination. These efforts will instead encourage the adoption of improved practices in the most hazardous mining and smelting operations. This campaign would engage technical experts, create multistakeholder partnerships, develop and promote consensus standards, and link safety, health and environmental concerns with economic development. The campaign’s goal is to change the norms of practice to prevent environmental contamination before medical treatment and costly cleanup operations are needed.

1 Soto-Jiménez MF, Flegal AR. “Childhood poisoning from a smelter in Torreon, Mexico.” Environmental Research 111 (2011): 590-596.
2 Pirrone N, et al. “Global Mercury Emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10 (2010): 5951-5964.
3 Telmer KH, Veiga MM. “World emissions of mercury from artisanal and small scale gold mining.” in Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere (2009): 131-172.
4 National Pollutant Release Inventory (Canada), National Pollutant Inventory (Australia), and Toxic Release Inventory (U.S.).
5 U.S. Geological Survey.
Eckley CSGustin MMarsik FMiller MB. “Measurement of surface mercury fluxes at active industrial gold mines in Nevada (USA).” Science of the Total Environment 409. 3 (2011): 514-22.
7 United Nations Environment Programme. “Draft business plan of the artisanal and small scale gold mining (ASGM) partnership area.” August 7, 2008.
8 Environmental Health News. “Townspeople, gold shopkeepers highly exposed to mercury in Peru.” April 11, 2011.
International Labour Organization. “Children in hazardous work.” 2011.

Advertisements

~ by FSVSF Admin on 18 November, 2011.

One Response to “Environmental Impacts of Mining and Smelting”

  1. wooowww. . . This is a very interesting article and I like, I am very pleased with the articles you post, this is very useful for us, Thank you for providing an excellent information and very valuable for us

    regards

    Clark Miners

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: